Publication:
Comparison of Two Different Distraction Methods Affecting the Level of Pain and Anxiety during Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.departmentc851c2a4-0472-4ca9-bba6-e9492fd4c018
cris.virtualsource.orcidc851c2a4-0472-4ca9-bba6-e9492fd4c018
dc.contributor.affiliationGulhane Training & Research Hospital; University of Health Sciences Turkey; University of Health Sciences Turkey; Turk Hava Kurumu University; Turkish Aeronautical Association
dc.contributor.authorGezginci, Elif; Iyigun, Emine; Yalcin, Serdar; Bedir, Selahattin; Ozgok, I. Yasar
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-25T11:45:12Z
dc.date.available2024-06-25T11:45:12Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractBackground: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy can cause pain and anxiety for patients. Despite the use of many distraction methods to reduce pain and anxiety, there is no study on the use of stress balls during lithotripsy. Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy of use of stress balls and music therapy to reduce pain and anxiety during lithotripsy. Design: This was a single-center, parallel randomized controlled trial. Settings: The study involved the lithotripsy unit in a training and research hospital in Turkey. Participants: The study included 120 patients who had kidney or ureter stones. Methods: The patients were randomly divided into three groups. The control group (group 1) received no interference, whereas experimental groups received stress ball (group 2) and music (group 3) interventions during lithotripsy, respectively. Data were collected using the Patient Information Form, visual analog scale, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Results: There was no statistically significant difference among the three groups in regard to anxiety and pain mean scores (p > .05). No statistically significant difference was found between anxiety scores before and after lithotripsy in each group (p > .05), whereas there was a statistically significant difference between pain scores during and after lithotripsy (p < .05). Conclusion: Based on the present study, no statistically significant difference was found between the use of stress balls and music in reducing pain and anxiety during lithotripsy. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of stress balls used during lithotripsy. (C) 2017 by the American Society for Pain Management Nursing
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.pmn.2017.09.005
dc.description.endpage302
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.pages8
dc.description.researchareasNursing
dc.description.startpage295
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2017.09.005
dc.description.volume19
dc.description.woscategoryNursing
dc.identifier.issn1524-9042
dc.identifier.urihttps://acikarsiv.thk.edu.tr/handle/123456789/1248
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
dc.relation.journalPAIN MANAGEMENT NURSING
dc.subjectMUSIC DECREASES; SEDATION; INTERVENTIONS; SURGERY; STONES
dc.titleComparison of Two Different Distraction Methods Affecting the Level of Pain and Anxiety during Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files