Publication:
A thermodynamic comparison of rhombic-drive and slider-crank mechanisms for a two-stroke SI engine

cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.department58c416aa-c763-4c4d-bee5-3993c13a4f71
cris.virtualsource.orcid58c416aa-c763-4c4d-bee5-3993c13a4f71
dc.contributor.affiliationTurk Hava Kurumu University; Turkish Aeronautical Association; Gazi University
dc.contributor.authorGultekin, Erol; Cinar, Can
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-25T11:44:56Z
dc.date.available2024-06-25T11:44:56Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractIn this study, mathematical models of a novel mechanism, rhombic-drive, for a two-stroke, spark ignition (SI) engine, and a two-stroke SI engine with a conventional slider-crank mechanism were performed in MATLAB software. Their performances were compared with kinematic and thermodynamic analyses. Mathematical model was conducted according to real cycle approach and some of the operating parameters such as compression ratio, swept volume, heat release time, and lambda were kept identical for both engines. Pressure, volume, temperature, heat release, heat transfer coefficient, work, piston speed, and acceleration changes were examined. Maximum in-cylinder pressure was taken at 222 degrees CA with 4,188 kPa for rhombic-drive engine while 190 degrees CA with 4,003 kPa for slider-crank mechanism engine and maximum temperature was only 39 K higher for rhombic-drive mechanism engine. Theoretical thermal efficiencies of rhombic-drive and slider-crank mechanism were 31.14% and 31.87%, respectively. Effective power of rhombic-drive mechanism engine was 2.12 kW, whereas slider-crank mechanism engine was 2.17 kW. Mechanical efficiency of rhombic-drive engine was obtained 85.89%, while this was only 86.21% for slider-crank mechanism engine.
dc.description.doi10.1080/15567036.2019.1639000
dc.description.endpage1077
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.pages18
dc.description.researchareasEnergy & Fuels; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
dc.description.startpage1060
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1639000
dc.description.volume44
dc.description.woscategoryEnergy & Fuels; Engineering, Chemical; Environmental Sciences
dc.identifier.issn1556-7036
dc.identifier.urihttps://acikarsiv.thk.edu.tr/handle/123456789/1192
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
dc.relation.journalENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
dc.subjectTwo-stroke engine; rhombic-drive mechanism; thermodynamic analysis; engine kinematics; cylinder pressure
dc.subjectSTIRLING ENGINE; PERFORMANCE
dc.titleA thermodynamic comparison of rhombic-drive and slider-crank mechanisms for a two-stroke SI engine
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files